all marketsSweetenersSugar Substitutes
San Francisco · 2 grocers · Contested

the sugar substitutes aisle

San Francisco's sugar substitutes aisle is a competitive shelf with clear leaders: 10 products from 5 brands across 2 grocers. lakanto owns the most shelf — 30% of SKUs, ahead of wholesome. The shelf leans weight management — 50% of SKUs carry that claim. Verdict: contested — real competition, no single winner (opportunity 67/100).

10
products
5
brands
$7.21
avg price
$4.49–$8.79
typical range

More in Sweeteners

Who owns the shelf

brands by share of the sugar substitutes shelf.

llakanto
30% of shelf3 SKUs
wwholesome
30% of shelf3 SKUs
mmadhava
20% of shelf2 SKUs
eequal
10% of shelf1 SKU
ssplenda
10% of shelf1 SKU

How it's positioned

the claims products on this shelf lead with — share of SKUs carrying each.

Weight Management
50%
Blood-Sugar Aware
40%
Keto
40%
Low-Carb
40%
Organic
30%
Gluten-Free
10%

Brand positioning

every brand by share of shelf × price. bubble size = the brand's total reach across all aisles; color = positioning stance. top-right owns the premium end; bottom-right owns the mainstream.

scale
premium leadersmainstream leadersniche premiumvalue playersshare of shelfavg price
Color:indulgentbetter-for-you
Size:total brand reach (SKUs across all aisles)

All stores combined. Tap a store to see who wins its shelf.

Market structure

24
low
Brand competition
how many brands compete
41
med
Variety of offers
how differentiated the shelf is
24
low
Top-brand grip
how much a few brands dominate
67
high
Launch whitespace
room for a new brand

store-brand share: 0% · scores 0–100.

More aisles

how we measure.prices & assortment are collected from public storefronts of San Franciscogrocers, deduped to distinct products, and normalized to a per-unit price from each product's parsed size. market-structure scores come from brand shares. figures update as we re-measure. full methodology →