all marketsFruit Snacks
San Francisco · 4 grocers · Contested

the fruit snacks aisle

San Francisco's fruit snacks aisle is a competitive shelf with clear leaders: 20 products from 6 brands across 4 grocers. annie's owns the most shelf — 30% of SKUs, ahead of solely: fruit jerky. The shelf leans gluten-free — 45% of SKUs carry that claim. Verdict: contested — real competition, no single winner (opportunity 57/100).

20
products
6
brands
$6.58
avg price
$1.99–$12.99
typical range

Zoom in

this aisle breaks into 1 sub-categories — open one for its own shelf report.

Who owns the shelf

brands by share of the fruit snacks shelf.

annie's
30% of shelf6 SKUs
ssolely: fruit jerky
30% of shelf6 SKUs
bbear fruit snacks
15% of shelf3 SKUs
tthe froot thief
10% of shelf2 SKUs
wwelch's
10% of shelf2 SKUs
ppummies
5% of shelf1 SKU

How it's positioned

the claims products on this shelf lead with — share of SKUs carrying each.

Gluten-Free
45%
Dairy-Free
45%
Vegetarian
45%
Plant-Based
35%
Organic
20%
Vegan
20%
Weight Management
15%
Seed-Oil-Free
10%

Brand positioning

every brand by share of shelf × price. bubble size = the brand's total reach across all aisles; color = positioning stance. top-right owns the premium end; bottom-right owns the mainstream.

scale
premium leadersmainstream leadersniche premiumvalue playersshare of shelfavg price
Color:indulgentbetter-for-you
Size:total brand reach (SKUs across all aisles)

All stores combined. Tap a store to see who wins its shelf.

Market structure

28
low
Brand competition
how many brands compete
83
high
Variety of offers
how differentiated the shelf is
23
low
Top-brand grip
how much a few brands dominate
57
med
Launch whitespace
room for a new brand

store-brand share: 0% · scores 0–100.

More aisles

how we measure.prices & assortment are collected from public storefronts of San Franciscogrocers, deduped to distinct products, and normalized to a per-unit price from each product's parsed size. market-structure scores come from brand shares. figures update as we re-measure. full methodology →